+ 44 7511 627697

info@daleacademy.com

Follow Us:

Salomon v Salomon – Case Summary

Summary: The requirements of correctly constituting a limited company

The concept of Separate Legal Personality (SLP) is the fundamental principle upon which company law is based. It lays the foundation for how a company operates and is considered to be one of the most important and steadfast rules in corporate jurisprudence. However, the application of this principle has been met with much controversy throughout history and is a commonly litigated topic both within and across different legal jurisdictions. Despite this, the rule established in the landmark case of Salomon v Salomon, still holds significant weight and is widely recognized as the central foundation of not only English company law but also of the global commercial legal system.

Commonly known as: Salomon v Salomon

Facts:

Salomon transferred his boot making business, which was originally run as a sole proprietorship, to a company called Salomon Ltd. The company was made up of himself and his family members. The transfer was paid for by giving Salomon shares and debentures, which had a floating charge on the assets of the company as a security for debt. Later, when the company’s business failed and it went into liquidation, Salomon’s right to recover the debt through the floating charge was prioritized over the claims of unsecured creditors, meaning they would receive nothing from the liquidation proceeds. To prevent this perceived injustice, the liquidator, acting on behalf of unsecured creditors, claimed that the company was a sham and was essentially acting as Salomon’s agent. Therefore, they sought to disregard the separate legal identity of Salomon Ltd. and make Salomon personally liable for the company’s debt, as if he were still conducting the business as a sole trader.

Issue

The case dealt with the claims of unsecured creditors in the liquidation process of Salomon Ltd., a company in which Salomon was the majority shareholder. The question at hand was whether, despite the separate legal identity of a company, a shareholder/controller could be held liable for its debt beyond their capital contribution, resulting in unlimited personal liability.

Ruling:

The Court of Appeal had ruled that Salomon Ltd. was a sham, as Salomon had set up the company in violation of the true intent of the Companies Act, 1862, and that Salomon had conducted the business as an agent of the company and should be held responsible for its debt. However, the ruling was overturned by the House of Lords on appeal. They held that as the company was properly incorporated, it is a separate legal entity with its own rights and liabilities, and the motives of those involved in setting up the company are irrelevant in determining those rights and liabilities. This established the legal principle of the “corporate veil” between the company and its owners/controllers, known as the Salomon principle.

Join UOL LLB Crash Course online along with Solved Pastpapers, click here for more information

Answering problem questions in the University of London LLB programme requires a clear understanding of legal principles, good analytical skills and the ability to apply the law to a given set of facts. Here are some tips to help you answer problem questions effectively:

  1. Read the question carefully: Make sure you understand what the question is asking before you begin writing.
  2. Identify the legal issues: Identify the legal issues raised by the facts and the relevant laws that apply to those issues.
  3. Analyze the facts: Analyze the facts presented in the question, focusing on the details that are relevant to the legal issues.
  4. Apply the law: Apply the relevant laws to the facts, making sure to consider all relevant legal principles and cases.
  5. Structure your answer: Use a clear and well-structured approach, starting with an introduction that outlines the main legal issues, followed by a discussion of the relevant laws and a conclusion that summarizes your analysis and sets out your conclusion.
  6. Use relevant cases and statutes: Cite relevant cases and statutes to support your analysis and help illustrate the legal principles you are discussing.
  7. Be concise: Be concise and to the point, focusing on the key issues and avoiding unnecessary detail.
  8. Proofread: Proofread your answer carefully to make sure it is error-free and clear.
  9. Time management: Make sure you manage your time effectively, leaving enough time to review your answer and make any necessary corrections.

By following these tips, you should be able to answer problem questions in the University of London LLB programme effectively and with confidence. Good luck!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Contact Info

Quick Links

Courses

LLB Notes

© 2024 Dale Academy is project of Ninety Two Chambers LLP  registered in England and Wales